If the universe obeyed Newton's laws of gravity, there would be about a 60% chance that Mercury would head toward the Sun or Venus during the Sun's lifetime. But according to a new study, corrections to Newton's laws using Einstein's theory of gravity (general relativity) lower these chances to about 1%. That's good news, because if Mercury had a near miss with Venus or the Sun, it could wreak havoc on Earth.
If that happens, Mercury would likely smash into Venus or the Sun, according to a new study by Jacques Laskar and Mickael Gastineau (Paris Observatory, France), published in the June 11th issue of Nature.
For all of Jupiter's mass, sending Mercury farther out than Venus requires an "alignment of planets" of sorts — a near-perfect geometry that physicists call a resonance — allowing a small effect to build up over time.
In the case of Jupiter and Mercury, the accidental matching is provided by the speed at which their elliptical orbits move around the Sun — the precession of their perihelia — which happens to be nearly synchronized. But the warping of space-time near the Sun predicted by general relativity introduces a slight mismatch, by speeding up Mercury's precession. So the resonance is less likely to happen.
We can thank Einstein once more (and Laskar too) for informing us that Mercury has only a 1% chance of going out of whack. Laskar's estimate following Newtonian gravity was 60%. "[The Newtonian calculation] had to be wrong," says Jack Lissauer (NASA/Ames Research Center), arguing that, with such high probabilities, Mercury would already have hit Venus or the Sun during the past few billion years.
Mercury's demise brings little consequences for Earth, unless Venus tidally disrupts Mercury, sending fragments our way. "There would be a lot of these chunks, and they could hit Earth," says Lissauer.
If Mercury goes haywire but misses Venus and the Sun on its new, highly eccentric trajectory, Mercury can perturb the orbits of Mars, Venus, or Earth; the more massive outer planets would remain unaffected.
It's difficult to know whether this will happen, because the solar system is chaotic. "That the system is chaotic doesn't mean anything can happen," Laskar explains, but relates to the "butterfly effect.." All the planets and smaller bodies gravitationally influence each other, meaning that any imprecision on today's trajectory is multiplied by ten every 10 million years.
Because of this chaos, astronomers will never be able to predict the positions of planets beyond a few hundred million years, and nobody can guarantee that Earth will even orbit the Sun so far in the future. "We can never overcome this limitation," says Laskar, even if the inaccuracy started out less than a trillionth of a trillionth of an inch.
"If I jump in the air, Earth moves more than that," Laskar says. So instead of aiming for the unknown exact trajectory of Mercury, Laskar and Gastineau went for a random sampling of what might happen. Modifying Mercury's current position in steps of 0.38 millimeters, they created 2,501 trajectories. These tiny variations could be thought of as due to Laskar jumping up, an asteroid or star passing by, the influences of tides, or the finite size of the planets. We can't tell the 2,501 trajectories apart today, but as they diverge in the future, they provide a sample of the innumerable possible outcomes.
The result is expressed in terms of probabilities, yielding the 1% for Mercury going haywire, and only a small fraction of this percent for it going haywire but missing Venus or the Sun. If it misses, Mercury can then send Mars or Venus hurling toward Earth, with dramatic consequences. Even without a direct hit, Earth's orbit can be enormously modified, Laskar says, "In all these cases, we have very strong climate change."
Mercury may cause chaotic events in the future, says Renu Malhotra (University of Arizona), but it might even owe its current eccentricity, inclination, and high density to some previous collision. Maybe this isn't a coincidence after all…
See a movie on Jacques Laskar's website. For an expert's opinion, read the News & Views in Nature by Greg Laughlin (University of California, Santa Cruz).
Fonte da notícia: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/48552537.html